We need to quote to a client for two routers capable of running a VPN
between two sites - easy, that's a MikroTik. But they want a fallback
to 3G/4G so that the site that falls back keeps Internet access AND so
that the VPN keeps running.
What's the state of MikroTik 3G/4G fallback? Last I looked it seemed
very roll-your-own, and supported only a few very specific dongles...
Ideally it would work like the (vastly more expensive) Merakis and just
fail everything over to the secondary link if the primary fails, where
"fail" would be either a ping test or interface down.
That said, I'm OK with a solution that needs more work, as long as once
done it is set-and-forget.
Any pointers?
Regards, K.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer(a)nullarbor.com.au) work +61 2 64957435
http://www.nullarbor.com.au mobile +61 428 957160
GPG fingerprint: 887A DA07 4DCC EE76 B413 27D4 C638 4189 6CF0 D556
Old fingerprint: 8454 EE43 6215 B6DD 1B4D 9D8D 984D 7BA1 7378 A38D
Hi all,
After seeing their presentation at the Melbourne MUM, we've been having a look at Axiom Cyber Shield. Is anyone on here using it and happy to provide some feedback, on-list or off-list? It certainly sounds like a good product, but I only seem to be able to find sales pitch information, not unbiased reviews.
Regards,
Philip Loenneker | Network Engineer | TasmaNet
40-50 Innovation Drive, Dowsing Point, Tas 7010, Australia
P: 1300 792 711
philip.loenneker(a)tasmanet.com.au<mailto:philip.loenneker@tasmanet.com.au>
www.tasmanet.com.au<http://www.tasmanet.com.au/>
Hi all,
I presently have a single ISP with full routes in my core router.
I did have, and will soon have again an IX connection.
We and importantly our customers have had a problem with the web site
nperf.com specifically we could not get a route to cdn.nperf.com.
I added a static route just to get it working,
My question is, should I or is it best practice to add a default route
0.0.0.0/0 to my ISP to catch any missing routes in my BGP?
Thanks in advance,
*Malcolm Faed.*
Broadcast Network Engineer
*Av-Comm*
avcomm.com.au
malcolm(a)avcomm.com.au
24/9 Powells Road, Brookvale, NSW 2100, Australia
P: +61 (2) 9939 4377
M: +61 409 601 747
[image: Twitter] <https://twitter.com/AvCommSatellite>
<https://plus.google.com/+AvcommAustralia/>[image: Youtube]
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCO8ZtcnwoTH7e54LAndE-yw>[image: Linkedin]
<https://www.linkedin.com/company-beta/6583589/>
This e-mail message may contain confidential or legally privileged
information and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s).
Any unauthorised disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying or the
taking of any action in reliance on the information herein is prohibited.
E-mails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they
can be intercepted, amended, or contain viruses. Anyone who communicates
with us by e-mail is deemed to have accepted these risks. Av-Comm is not
responsible for errors or omissions in this message and denies any
responsibility for any damage arising from the use of e-mail. Any opinion
and other statement contained in this message and any attachment are solely
those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company.
Hi Team,
While I already understand that RouterOS does not listen on VRF interfaces
for IP services (Winbox, SSH etc) - I am interested to know if anyone has
put together some janky mangle rules to make this work?
Cheers,
Dave