- Public - talk.mikrotik.com.au

multi slot Tik box
by David Ryan 07 Nov '15

07 Nov '15

Howdy all, Having a look at routerboard.com recently makes me wonder if there are too many models available. This got me to thinking about a multi slot Tik box, something along the lines of other big companies e.g. Ci$co 2800 series integrated routers. I realise this would increase costs but it could mean that you pay for what you need with the possibility of upgrading later on. Just wondering what others might think. I admit I have not searched the forum for this topic. Regards, Dave. -- David Ryan - 0402 054 426 RJS Communications dsryan(a)rjs.com.au MTCNA, MTCWE, MTCRE

1 0

4G Modems....again
by Paul Julian 06 Nov '15

06 Nov '15

Hi guys, anybody successfully got the ZTE MF823 modems working on Mikrotik Routerboard USB ? Regards Paul

6 18

Re: [MT-AU Public] X86
by Alex Samad - Yieldbroker 28 Oct '15

28 Oct '15

Hi I have to admit it was a while ago. Also I looked through the slides from Melbourne they mentioned it would be fixed in 7 ... soon :) I had 2 VM's which were able to iperf 9.8Gb/s tcp. Place the CCR in the middle and it dropped to 1Gb/s. if I started 8 parralel tcp streams I go 8Gb/s A Not sure if this dup or not .. -----Original Message----- From: Public [mailto:public-bounces@talk.mikrotik.com.au] On Behalf Of Mike Everest Sent: Tuesday, 20 October 2015 2:46 PM To: 'MikroTik Australia Public List' <public(a)talk.mikrotik.com.au> Subject: Re: [MT-AU Public] X86 What routerOS version shows that behaviour? I know that there has been a heap of work done on multi-core queue architecture since around 6.20 to 6.28 - they claim enormous performance boost (like up to 15 times faster!) in high traffic situation. Also, make sure that your testing methodology does not introduce some limitation. Btest, for example, is limited to 1 cpu, so if your btest client pegs a CPU, it is not necessarily indicative of a limitation with routing ;-) Cheers! Mike. > -----Original Message----- > From: Public [mailto:public-bounces@talk.mikrotik.com.au] On Behalf Of > Alex Samad - Yieldbroker > Sent: Tuesday, 20 October 2015 2:36 PM > To: terry(a)skymesh.net.au; MikroTik Australia Public List > <public(a)talk.mikrotik.com.au> > Subject: Re: [MT-AU Public] X86 > > Hi > > So was that a yes or no > > http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=82359 << this is a > thread I started, I have read other threads about it. Seems to be > based around the fact the CCR code base it not multi threaded another > example being the BGP > > > as for http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=62377 not sure what I > was supposed to get from that, those where not CCR's > > sorry maybe im missing something ? > > A > > -----Original Message----- > From: Terry Sweetser (SkyMesh) [mailto:terry+mikrotik@skymesh.net.au] > Sent: Tuesday, 20 October 2015 1:28 PM > To: Alex Samad - Yieldbroker <Alex.Samad(a)yieldbroker.com>; MikroTik > Australia Public List <public(a)talk.mikrotik.com.au> > Subject: Re: [MT-AU Public] X86 > > http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=62377 > > --- > http://about.me/terry.sweetser > > On 17/10/15 06:45, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote: > > Question were you able to get above 1Gb single tcp stream on the CCR. > > > > When I was testing on my ccr36 I could never get a single tcp stream above > 1Gb/s > > > > A > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Public mailing list > Public(a)talk.mikrotik.com.au > http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com. > au _______________________________________________ Public mailing list Public(a)talk.mikrotik.com.au http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com.au Sent from my smart phone

5 18

inbound ratelimiting
by Alex Samad - Yieldbroker 26 Oct '15

26 Oct '15

Any one tried doing this ? I want to rate limit what guest can download from the internet. Previously I tried doing this with delaying/rate limiting ack's. It has been a long time since I have dobe that Anyone had any success with this ? A

2 2

MikroTik as an LNS
by Tim Warnock 21 Oct '15

21 Oct '15

Ahoi, Dunno when it was actually put into play: but I noticed in the latest 6.33rc25 MikroTik now supports the specification of an L2TP Tunnel Secret for a source IP range. Meaning it can terminate sessions directly from wholesalers who use L2TP Tunnel passwords. Nice!

2 3

X86 USB License Keys?
by Terry Sweetser (SkyMesh) 20 Oct '15

20 Oct '15

Hi Mikrotikians, Have embarked upon a grand adventure to build a multiple 10Gbps machine on R/OS and hit a snag ... The 24 hours have expired on the R/OS test and I need to add the KEY to the USB image to get the machine up and running. How to do that? -- http://about.me/terry.sweetser

4 11

Script Recording
by Andrew Gilbett 19 Oct '15

19 Oct '15

Hi All, Just a quick question is there a way to "record" a script in winbox etc... for later reuse? Much like the record macro for excel. Thanks Andrew

1 0

Re: [MT-AU Public] fttn
by Mike Everest 16 Oct '15

16 Oct '15

> -----Original Message----- > From: Public [mailto:public-bounces@talk.mikrotik.com.au] On Behalf Of > Damien Gardner Jnr > Sent: Tuesday, 6 October 2015 10:18 AM > To: MikroTik Australia Public List <public(a)talk.mikrotik.com.au> > Subject: Re: [MT-AU Public] power routerboard and modem with one supply .. > FTTN ordered today, so not much longer on ADSL. Hoping that fixes our > constant dropouts! It's still a dsl type tail though isn't it? Hope the copper is good! ;-) Just curious: what ISP did you order it from? Cheers!

6 6

Dynadish ??
by Paul Julian 13 Oct '15

13 Oct '15

Hi guys, just wondering if anybody has any real-world experience on the Dynadish ? I am thinking of deploying a pair of them to tackle a clear LOS PTP link of 35km, all the link planners say I will be at around -61 signal at that distance with those radios and antennas, just wondering if anybody has any comments good or bad before I give it a go. Thanks Paul

3 4

power routerboard and modem with one supply
by Mike Everest 06 Oct '15

06 Oct '15

Hi All! I've been discussing possibility of using USB port on 2011/951 series to power up a modem like TP-link 8816 which uses 5v power supply using a cable like this: http://miniimg2.rightinthebox.com/images/384x384/201403/ljhnpo1394624693508. jpg I checked with MT engineering team, and received promising response: "The minimum output current both models can provide is 500mA. RB951Ui-2HnD and RB2011 with wireless should be able to supply even up to 1A of output current. RB2011 without wireless should be able provide up to 2A output current. Only note that we guarantee the minimum output current" So TP-Link ships with a 5v/1A power supply and so assuming that the device actually consumes 'up to 1A' then perhaps routerBoards able to supply 'up to 1A' might actually work as a pair. Although I'm thinking that the power consumption will increase as packet throughput increases on both, then perhaps as the transfer load ramps up, power available to the modem may be constrained, and so might cause trouble under load. So I find myself wondering whether someone else may have already been own this path and so if you have, and are willing to share your observations, I'm most curious as to how it turned out! :-) Cheers! Mike.

5 7