Hi Alex, Sorry to harp on with the same suggestion over and over :-} I have discussed this behaviour report at some length with MikroTik and they tell me that there is no reason why that behaviour should occur. They are very keen to try to reproduce the issue and investigate further for a fix, but they have not been able to reproduce the problem, and so they can't even begin to address it. Therefore, if anyone at all can provide us with some steps to reproduce the issue (send it to support@duxtel.com) then we'll be very pleased to take it up with MikroTik for review and comment :-) Cheers! Mike.
-----Original Message----- From: Public [mailto:public-bounces@talk.mikrotik.com.au] On Behalf Of Alex Samad - Yieldbroker Sent: Tuesday, 20 October 2015 5:43 PM To: public@talk.mikrotik.com.au Subject: Re: [MT-AU Public] X86
Hi
I have to admit it was a while ago. Also I looked through the slides from Melbourne they mentioned it would be fixed in 7 ... soon :)
I had 2 VM's which were able to iperf 9.8Gb/s tcp. Place the CCR in the middle and it dropped to 1Gb/s. if I started 8 parralel tcp streams I go 8Gb/s
A
Not sure if this dup or not ..
-----Original Message-----
From: Public [mailto:public-bounces@talk.mikrotik.com.au] On Behalf Of Mike Everest
Sent: Tuesday, 20 October 2015 2:46 PM
To: 'MikroTik Australia Public List' <public@talk.mikrotik.com.au>
Subject: Re: [MT-AU Public] X86
What routerOS version shows that behaviour? I know that there has been a heap of work done on multi-core queue architecture since around 6.20 to 6.28
- they claim enormous performance boost (like up to 15 times faster!) in high traffic situation.
Also, make sure that your testing methodology does not introduce some limitation. Btest, for example, is limited to 1 cpu, so if your btest client pegs a CPU, it is not necessarily indicative of a limitation with routing ;-)
Cheers!
Mike.
-----Original Message-----
From: Public [mailto:public-bounces@talk.mikrotik.com.au] On Behalf Of
Alex Samad - Yieldbroker
Sent: Tuesday, 20 October 2015 2:36 PM
To: terry@skymesh.net.au; MikroTik Australia Public List
<public@talk.mikrotik.com.au>
Subject: Re: [MT-AU Public] X86
Hi
So was that a yes or no
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=82359 << this is a
thread I started, I have read other threads about it. Seems to be
based around the fact the CCR code base it not multi threaded another
example being the BGP
as for http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=62377 not sure what I
was supposed to get from that, those where not CCR's
sorry maybe im missing something ?
A
-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Sweetser (SkyMesh) [mailto:terry+mikrotik@skymesh.net.au]
Sent: Tuesday, 20 October 2015 1:28 PM
To: Alex Samad - Yieldbroker <Alex.Samad@yieldbroker.com>; MikroTik
Australia Public List <public@talk.mikrotik.com.au>
Subject: Re: [MT-AU Public] X86
---
On 17/10/15 06:45, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
Question were you able to get above 1Gb single tcp stream on the CCR.
When I was testing on my ccr36 I could never get a single tcp stream
above
1Gb/s
A
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
Public@talk.mikrotik.com.au
http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com.
au
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
Public@talk.mikrotik.com.au
http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com.au
Sent from my smart phone _______________________________________________ Public mailing list Public@talk.mikrotik.com.au http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com.au