IPv4 needs to be re check summed as the packets pass through (IE: due to ttl decreasing). IPv6 doesn't have such a checksum. -----Original Message----- From: Public [mailto:public-bounces@talk.mikrotik.com.au] On Behalf Of Alex Samad - Yieldbroker Sent: Wednesday, 21 October 2015 7:52 AM To: MikroTik Australia Public List <public@talk.mikrotik.com.au> Subject: Re: [MT-AU Public] X86 Hmm, I didn't test ipv6, but I would presume so. A -----Original Message----- From: Public [mailto:public-bounces@talk.mikrotik.com.au] On Behalf Of Tim Warnock Sent: Tuesday, 20 October 2015 6:46 PM To: 'MikroTik Australia Public List' <public@talk.mikrotik.com.au> Subject: Re: [MT-AU Public] X86 Out of interest, is it the same for IPv6? -----Original Message----- From: Public [mailto:public-bounces@talk.mikrotik.com.au] On Behalf Of Alex Samad - Yieldbroker Sent: Tuesday, 20 October 2015 4:43 PM To: public@talk.mikrotik.com.au Subject: Re: [MT-AU Public] X86 Hi I have to admit it was a while ago. Also I looked through the slides from Melbourne they mentioned it would be fixed in 7 ... soon :) I had 2 VM's which were able to iperf 9.8Gb/s tcp. Place the CCR in the middle and it dropped to 1Gb/s. if I started 8 parralel tcp streams I go 8Gb/s A Not sure if this dup or not .. -----Original Message----- From: Public [mailto:public-bounces@talk.mikrotik.com.au] On Behalf Of Mike Everest Sent: Tuesday, 20 October 2015 2:46 PM To: 'MikroTik Australia Public List' <public@talk.mikrotik.com.au> Subject: Re: [MT-AU Public] X86 What routerOS version shows that behaviour? I know that there has been a heap of work done on multi-core queue architecture since around 6.20 to 6.28 - they claim enormous performance boost (like up to 15 times faster!) in high traffic situation. Also, make sure that your testing methodology does not introduce some limitation. Btest, for example, is limited to 1 cpu, so if your btest client pegs a CPU, it is not necessarily indicative of a limitation with routing ;-) Cheers! Mike.
-----Original Message-----
From: Public [mailto:public-bounces@talk.mikrotik.com.au] On Behalf Of
Alex Samad - Yieldbroker
Sent: Tuesday, 20 October 2015 2:36 PM
To: terry@skymesh.net.au; MikroTik Australia Public List
<public@talk.mikrotik.com.au>
Subject: Re: [MT-AU Public] X86
Hi
So was that a yes or no
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=82359 << this is a
thread I started, I have read other threads about it. Seems to be
based around the fact the CCR code base it not multi threaded another
example being the BGP
as for http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=62377 not sure what I
was supposed to get from that, those where not CCR's
sorry maybe im missing something ?
A
-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Sweetser (SkyMesh) [mailto:terry+mikrotik@skymesh.net.au]
Sent: Tuesday, 20 October 2015 1:28 PM
To: Alex Samad - Yieldbroker <Alex.Samad@yieldbroker.com>; MikroTik
Australia Public List <public@talk.mikrotik.com.au>
Subject: Re: [MT-AU Public] X86
---
On 17/10/15 06:45, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
Question were you able to get above 1Gb single tcp stream on the CCR.
When I was testing on my ccr36 I could never get a single tcp stream
above
1Gb/s
A
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
Public@talk.mikrotik.com.au
http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com.
au
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list Public@talk.mikrotik.com.au http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com.au Sent from my smart phone _______________________________________________ Public mailing list Public@talk.mikrotik.com.au http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com.au _______________________________________________ Public mailing list Public@talk.mikrotik.com.au http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com.au _______________________________________________ Public mailing list Public@talk.mikrotik.com.au http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com.au