I tried doing that; adding /32 addresses to both ends then creating routes to the other address via the respective interfaces. No dice. Regards, Christopher Hawker On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 19:20, Roger Plant via Public < public@talk.mikrotik.com.au> wrote:
Can you setup a /32, which looks like a /31? (or is that what you have?)
eg. address xx.34 network xx.35
Date sent: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 17:32:49 +1100 To: public@talk.mikrotik.com.au Subject: [MT-AU Public] /31 Deployments for Point-to-Point links From: Christopher Hawker via Public < public@talk.mikrotik.com.au> Send reply to: MikroTik Australia Public List < public@talk.mikrotik.com.au> Copies to: Christopher Hawker <chris@thesysadmin.au>
[ Double-click this line for list subscription options ]
Hey all,
Trying to stand-up a BGP session between a CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS and a CCR2004-16G-2S+ using a /31 for the link. I'm able to ping across the link no problem, however, the BGP session doesn't establish. I'm attempting to move an existing session from a /30 where it works in order to conserve IP space. Is there some skullduggery going on, or is 7.13 just not RFC3021-compliant?
Thanks, Christopher Hawker _______________________________________________ Public mailing list Public@talk.mikrotik.com.au http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com. au---------------------------- Roger Plant
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list Public@talk.mikrotik.com.au http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com.au