I've got an aging Ruckus unit at home that is also starting to fail and have been considering much the same as Tim The other option I've had in mind would be the wAP ac - on paper they look reasonably similar for this use-case - is there anything particularly different about them that would make one better than the other for a standard home scenario? -----Original Message----- From: Public <public-bounces@talk.mikrotik.com.au> On Behalf Of Jason Hecker Sent: Tuesday, 19 May 2020 8:53 AM To: public@talk.mikrotik.com.au Subject: Re: [MT-AU Public] cAP AC They are great units. I use them primarily in CAPSMAN systems - the largest site with 17. The latest stable and long term software seems to have ironed out all the kinks (or "instabilities" as Mikrotik like to call them) and they work really well - I have no qualms using them in plain old wireless and CAP mode. Regards, Jason Hecker <https://www.upandrunningtech.com.au/> <https://www.upandrunningtech.com.au/> On Tue, 19 May 2020, at 08:46, Tim Warnock wrote:
Hey Guys,
I have a single out-of-support UBNT AC AP at home that uses a ton of power and is literally falling apart.
Looking at either going a newer UBNT or maybe a cAP AC.
There's a couple of things the UBNT boxes do that I don't like (single MAC per registration is one and the controller software is both a blessing and a curse).
If you had a choice, what would you choose? Any odd behaviour or weird incompatibilities with the cAP AC?
Thanks Tim
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list Public@talk.mikrotik.com.au http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com.au
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list Public@talk.mikrotik.com.au http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com.au