Is there a way to bind snmp to a specific interface (say the loopback) so it will respond back with the same ip address it was polled on?
I don't believe so, it should use the IP address of the interface It exits the router from normally. Regards Paul -----Original Message----- From: Public [mailto:public-bounces@talk.mikrotik.com.au] On Behalf Of Craig Askings Sent: Friday, 7 July 2017 1:46 PM To: MikroTik Australia Public List Subject: [MT-AU Public] Binding snmp to an interface Is there a way to bind snmp to a specific interface (say the loopback) so it will respond back with the same ip address it was polled on? _______________________________________________ Public mailing list Public@talk.mikrotik.com.au http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com.au
Hmm that doesn't help when router has multiple exit paths to the NMS. Is the router down or did the network just reconverge on a new path? That isn't a question I want to be figuring out at 3am in the morning.
On 7 Jul 2017, at 2:08 pm, Paul Julian <paul@oxygennetworks.com.au> wrote:
I don't believe so, it should use the IP address of the interface It exits the router from normally.
Regards Paul
-----Original Message----- From: Public [mailto:public-bounces@talk.mikrotik.com.au] On Behalf Of Craig Askings Sent: Friday, 7 July 2017 1:46 PM To: MikroTik Australia Public List Subject: [MT-AU Public] Binding snmp to an interface
Is there a way to bind snmp to a specific interface (say the loopback) so it will respond back with the same ip address it was polled on? _______________________________________________ Public mailing list Public@talk.mikrotik.com.au http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com.au
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list Public@talk.mikrotik.com.au http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com.au
Are you waiting for the router to send you traps or are you polling SNMP ? If you are polling SNMP then I'm not sure what difference it would make ? Normally your SNMP polling would be able to identify if an interface has gone down on a router and the router is still up. Regards paul -----Original Message----- From: Public [mailto:public-bounces@talk.mikrotik.com.au] On Behalf Of Craig Askings Sent: Friday, 7 July 2017 2:11 PM To: MikroTik Australia Public List Subject: Re: [MT-AU Public] Binding snmp to an interface Hmm that doesn't help when router has multiple exit paths to the NMS. Is the router down or did the network just reconverge on a new path? That isn't a question I want to be figuring out at 3am in the morning.
On 7 Jul 2017, at 2:08 pm, Paul Julian <paul@oxygennetworks.com.au> wrote:
I don't believe so, it should use the IP address of the interface It exits the router from normally.
Regards Paul
-----Original Message----- From: Public [mailto:public-bounces@talk.mikrotik.com.au] On Behalf Of Craig Askings Sent: Friday, 7 July 2017 1:46 PM To: MikroTik Australia Public List Subject: [MT-AU Public] Binding snmp to an interface
Is there a way to bind snmp to a specific interface (say the loopback) so it will respond back with the same ip address it was polled on? _______________________________________________ Public mailing list Public@talk.mikrotik.com.au http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com.au
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list Public@talk.mikrotik.com.au http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com.au
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list Public@talk.mikrotik.com.au http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com.au
Because SNMP doesn’t work with asymmetric routing in RoS - PITA actually. From: Paul Julian [mailto:paul@oxygennetworks.com.au] Sent: July 7, 2017 at 2:17:33 PM GMT+10 To: MikroTik Australia Public List <public@talk.mikrotik.com.au> Subject: Re: [MT-AU Public] Binding snmp to an interface Are you waiting for the router to send you traps or are you polling SNMP ? If you are polling SNMP then I'm not sure what difference it would make ? Normally your SNMP polling would be able to identify if an interface has gone down on a router and the router is still up. Regards paul -----Original Message----- From: Public [mailto:public-bounces@talk.mikrotik.com.au] On Behalf Of Craig Askings Sent: Friday, 7 July 2017 2:11 PM To: MikroTik Australia Public List Subject: Re: [MT-AU Public] Binding snmp to an interface Hmm that doesn't help when router has multiple exit paths to the NMS. Is the router down or did the network just reconverge on a new path? That isn't a question I want to be figuring out at 3am in the morning.
On 7 Jul 2017, at 2:08 pm, Paul Julian <paul@oxygennetworks.com.au> wrote:
I don't believe so, it should use the IP address of the interface It exits the router from normally.
Regards Paul
-----Original Message----- From: Public [mailto:public-bounces@talk.mikrotik.com.au] On Behalf Of Craig Askings Sent: Friday, 7 July 2017 1:46 PM To: MikroTik Australia Public List Subject: [MT-AU Public] Binding snmp to an interface
Is there a way to bind snmp to a specific interface (say the loopback) so it will respond back with the same ip address it was polled on? _______________________________________________ Public mailing list Public@talk.mikrotik.com.au http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com.au
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list Public@talk.mikrotik.com.au http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com.au
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list Public@talk.mikrotik.com.au http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com.au _______________________________________________ Public mailing list Public@talk.mikrotik.com.au http://talk.mikrotik.com.au/mailman/listinfo/public_talk.mikrotik.com.au
participants (3)
-
Craig Askings -
Dave Browning -
Paul Julian