Public

Download

public@talk.mikrotik.com.au

August 2016

21 participants
12 discussions

10GBase-T SAN
by Ben Jackson 08 Aug '16

08 Aug '16

Hi all, I'm looking at implementing a iSCSI SAN / NAS hybrid solution for one of my clients who runs a production studio (24bit multi-track audio and up to 4k video collaboration). I haven't, however had any experience with installing 10Gbe networks as yet, and know very little about them apart from that cat6a is required to go over 100m and that latency is higher with copper vs SFP+. My initial reaction was to go with 10GBase-T as it's a familiar format to me (especially where running cable is concerned) but I'm happy to be convinced on the merits of running fibre. Does anyone have any experiences they can share on this topic? Thanks, Ben Jackson eLogik m:0404 924745 e: ben(a)elogik.net w: www.elogik.com.au [image: http://www.elogik.com.au] <http://www.elogik.com.au>

4 10

RB962 wireless issue?
by Nick Pratley 05 Aug '16

05 Aug '16

Hi All, Recently upgraded the RB951 at home with a RB962 AC model. Ever since swapping this out, (running the same configuration), traffic to / from any device on wireless suffers high latency. There is absolutely no loss from the router to the server. Makes working on the server extremely difficult. Thought maybe a bridge issue, as I couldn't replicate from the mikrotik to the laptop, however left the pings running for a while this morning and it started from here also which makes it that much more interesting. Any ideas what this could be before I format and re-install the macbook? CPU at ~5%, have tried wireless-fp and wireless-cm2 packages. Haven't tried moving the laptop to the 2.4G AP as yet. .1 - mikrotik .10 - laptop .251 - server >From Mikrotik 0 192.168.15.10 56 64 213ms 1 192.168.15.10 56 64 33ms 2 192.168.15.10 56 64 59ms 3 192.168.15.10 56 64 79ms 4 192.168.15.10 56 64 109ms 5 192.168.15.10 56 64 128ms 6 192.168.15.10 56 64 151ms 7 192.168.15.10 56 64 170ms 0 192.168.15.10 56 64 213ms 1 192.168.15.10 56 64 33ms 2 192.168.15.10 56 64 59ms 3 192.168.15.10 56 64 79ms 4 192.168.15.10 56 64 109ms 5 192.168.15.10 56 64 128ms 6 192.168.15.10 56 64 151ms 7 192.168.15.10 56 64 170ms >From server 64 bytes from 192.168.15.10: icmp_seq=144 ttl=64 time=75.1 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.15.10: icmp_seq=145 ttl=64 time=2.42 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.15.10: icmp_seq=146 ttl=64 time=955 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.15.10: icmp_seq=147 ttl=64 time=7507 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.15.10: icmp_seq=148 ttl=64 time=6508 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.15.10: icmp_seq=149 ttl=64 time=5508 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.15.10: icmp_seq=150 ttl=64 time=4509 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.15.10: icmp_seq=151 ttl=64 time=3509 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.15.10: icmp_seq=152 ttl=64 time=2510 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.15.10: icmp_seq=153 ttl=64 time=1510 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.15.10: icmp_seq=154 ttl=64 time=511 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.15.10: icmp_seq=155 ttl=64 time=138 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.15.10: icmp_seq=156 ttl=64 time=2003 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.15.10: icmp_seq=157 ttl=64 time=1003 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.15.10: icmp_seq=158 ttl=64 time=4.11 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.15.10: icmp_seq=159 ttl=64 time=27.7 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.15.10: icmp_seq=160 ttl=64 time=51.1 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.15.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.272 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.15.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=1.95 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.15.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.190 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.15.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.124 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.15.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.244 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.15.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.140 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.15.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.143 ms Cheers Nick

3 8